Put Down That Kale Smoothie – Why You Should Cook Your Food

I hear and read about lots of people making kale smoothies, consuming raw nuts, and munching salads consisting of raw broccoli. So, I decided to take a look at some research to see what the nutritional costs were to eating raw foods. The truth is, it’s better for your body to consume primarily cooked or lacto-fermented vegetables. Breaking down the cellular structure of vegetables through these methods greatly increases the digestibility and nutrient absorption of nutrients in vegetables. Much of the research I’ve found suggests several reasons why cooking might increase the energy available from meat. These include increasing food intake through positive effects on palatability related to texture and flavor, rendering proteins more digestible through denaturation, lowering the cost of digestion through food softening, and reducing immune upregulation by eliminating foodborne pathogens. Given that textural changes are at least partially responsible for the proposed positive effects of cooking on intake, digestibility, and the cost of digestion, non-thermal processing methods that manipulate texture, such as pounding, may likewise be effective in improving the net energy value of meat.

Foods have been heat-treated for many centuries, since our ancestors learned, by trial and error, to master fire for cooking purposes approx. 700,000 years ago, to modify the taste and preserve nutritional properties of foods. The invention and continuous development of food treatment has had a substantial, if not major impact on the intellectual, societal and economic development of mankind. The health benefits of fermentation have been known for centuries. In 76 A.D., the Roman historian Plinio advocated the use of fermented milks for treating gastrointestinal infections.

Cooking destroys toxins.

The first and most important beneficial effect of food processing is that it destroys unwanted compounds and micro-organisms. Pathogenic bacteria are killed when exposed to heat. Cooking also inactivates anti-nutritional factors such as protease inhibitors and other natural toxins. The second effect is enhanced digestibility of food and bioavailability of nutrients. For example, gelatinization of starch makes possible its hydrolysis by amylase enzymes. Destruction of cell walls in vegetables improves the bioavailability of compounds such as carotenoids and polyphenols. Nuts and seeds contain many anti-nutrients in their raw state. Soaking your nuts overnight will increase the bioavailability of the nutrients in nuts and seeds.

Crucifers (like kale) should always be cooked.

Certain foods are associated with disrupted thyroid hormone production. Foods belonging to the cruciferous family are called “crucifers,” and include broccoli, kale, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, mustard, kohlrabi, and turnips. These foods appear to reduce thyroid function by blocking thyroid peroxidase, and also by disrupting messages that are sent across the membranes of thyroid cells. Cooking these vegetables greatly reduces these negative effects.

Eating raw food has a cost.

Cooking also appears to have a positive effect on net energy in the body. Humans on vegetarian diets exhibit higher reproductive performance when eating cooked  food than raw food. Evidence of low energy intake in women eating predominantly rawfood is supported by their having higher rates of amenorrhea or menstrual  irregularities than those eating cooked food.  In one study, it was found that menstruation was absent in 23% of females of childbearing age who ate at least 70% of their food raw and in 50% of women reporting a 100% raw diet. Although these women were primarily vegetarian, the addition of raw meat to the diet did not change the odds of ovarian suppression. The researchers concluded that women suffered because of their relatively low net energy gain as a consequence of  eating their food raw.  A nutritional analysis suggested that in traditional communities, a diet of raw wild foods would render survival and reproduction difficult.

Fermentation improves gut flora.

Fermentation is a non-thermal process that produces chemical changes by enzymes produced from bacteria, microorganisms or yeasts and is one of the oldest known food preservation techniques. During fermentation, the carbohydrate energy source in food, such as lactose in milk is converted to lactic acid. The same happens when pickles are produced from cucumbers. Yeasts convert glucose to ethanol and carbon dioxide. Many health-producing secondary metabolites are produced through fermentation, especially B vitamins and bioactive peptides which can be antimicrobial and immune-stimulatory. In the early 1900s it was realized that bifidobacteria may be effective in preventing infection in infants and the consumption of fermented milks were seen to reverse putrefactive effects of the gut micro flora, leading to the development of the probiotic concept. Probiotics are now used in the treatment of infections and used to promote a  healthy immune system. Consuming fermented foods will improve the presence of healthy bacteria in the gut.

Pounding, curing and cooking meat is beneficial.

When considering meat, there seems to be some evidence that processing meat either by pounding, drying, curing or cooking is beneficial. Pounding meat and making it soft seems to reduce the cost of digestion, partly because it pass more quickly through the gut. The collagen surrounding each fascicle of muscle fibers generally remains too tough for mastication until heated to 60–70 C, when collagen begins to be hydrolysed into gelatin, a soluble protein. Although the muscle fibers themselves remain tough, eat cooked beyond this temperature leads to gelatinisation of the collagen, which separates leads the muscle fibers and the gelatin.

Improved texture of meat makes it easier to chew, and easier for our bodies to break down. Also when the fats are heated to oil from a fat, it’s easier for our bile to emulsify and ultimately leads to faster absorption. In studies, humans and chimps prefer the taste of cooked meat, leading to us eating more of it. Consumption of more protein meant larger brains and bigger muscles as we evolved.

Higher fat meats can lead to better energy balance.

It is important to note that eating cooked very lean meats has a nutritional cost. Archaeological evidence suggests that fat derived from bone marrow may have been preferred over muscle tissue as a source of energy and nutrients among early humans. Diets deriving more than 50% of calories from lean protein can lead to negative energy balance, so-called ‘‘rabbit starvation,’’ due to the high metabolic costs of protein digestion.

Avoiding pathogens in meat.

Cooking kills foodborne bacteria, including strains associated with raw meat products such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Staphylococcus, and
Listeria. The potential energy savings due to reduced immune maintenance and upregulation could be sizeable. Raw wild meat is possibly less pathogen-bearing on average than raw meat that has been raised and processed for mass-market consumption. When meat is processed at the slaughterhouse, ecoli and other  pathogens from the intestines can invade the ground meat. This is why most outbreaks involve burgers and other forms of ground meat but is not usually associated with steaks. These pathogens do not enter the inside of the muscle tissue (steaks). When eating industrially raised red meat, I suggest cooking the burgers well. Slow cooking meat appears to be one of the best methods to prepare meat for optimal digestibility.

Lighly cooked fish is healthier than raw or fried.

In the case of fish, it appears that lightly cooked is optimal. In one study where edible portions of fresh fish were used raw, fried, cooked and undercooked, the researchers concluded that the breakdown of fish proteins were all fairly complete, but general digestibility was greatest with underdone fish as compared to raw, fully cooked or fried fish.

In summary, I strongly suggest cooking vegetables, consuming lacto-fermented vegetables, and other fermented foods. If you like to eat raw meat, make sure it is from a very clean source and it’s safer to stick to muscle and organs which are less likely to be contaminated with pathogens. If you are out at a restaurant and  want a standard industrially-raised beef burger, order it cooked well. Focus on slow cooking processes and using primarily grass-fed and wild meats, where the animals are much less likely to be sick (and get you sick). These meats will also have a much better ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fats, thereby keeping inflammation down. Sashimi and other raw fish from trusted sources are ok, but lightly cooked fish seems to be optimal as far as protein digestion.

 

References:

Barham, P., 2001. The Science of Cooking. Springer, Berlin.

Blumenschine, R.J., Hominid carnivory and foraging strategies, and the socioeconomic function of early archaeological sites. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1991, Series B 334, 211–221.

Blumenschine, R.J., Madrigal, T.C., Variability in long bone marrow yields of East African ungulates and its zooarchaeological implications. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1993 20, 555–587.

Carmody, Rachel N.; Wrangham, Richard W., The energetic significance of cooking. Journal of Human Evolution 2009, 57, 379–391.

Evenepoel, P., Geypens, B., Luypaerts, A., Hiele, M., Rutgeerts, P., Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 1716–1722.

Halton, T.L., Hu, F.B., The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J.Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 373–385.

Koebnick, C., Strassner, C., Hoffmann, I., Leitzmann, C.,  Consequences of a long-term raw food diet on body weight and menstruation: results of a questionnaire survey. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1999, 43, 69–79.

Laden, G., in: Eisenbrand, G., Engel, K.-H., Grunow, W., Hartwig, A., Knorr, D., Knudsen, I., Schlatter, J., Schreier, Thermal Processing of Food: Potential Health
Benefits and Risks. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Symposium, 2006, Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM).

Oka, K., Sakuarae, A., Fujise, T., Yoshimatsu, H., Sakata, T., Nakata, M., Food texture differences affect energy metabolism in rats. J. Dent. Res. 2003, 82, 491–494.

Saha, K.C. The Effect of boiling and frying on the enzymic hydrolysis of fish protein. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. 194017, 259-63.

Speth, J.A., Spielmann, K.A., Energy source, protein metabolism,and huntergatherer subsistence strategies. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 1983, 2, 1–31.

Van Boekel, Martinus; Fogliano, Vincenzo; Pellegrini, Nicoletta; Stanton, Catherine; Scholz, Gabriele; Lalljie, Sam; Somoza, Veronika; Knorr, Dietrich; Rao Jasti, Pratima; Eisenbrand, Gerard, A review on the beneficial aspects of food processing. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1215–1247.

Wrangham, R., 2009. Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human. Basic Books, New York, NY.

 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Valerie-Jaquith/100000785493600 Valerie Jaquith

    This is a great article and well informed! Thank you! A video lecture at http://vimeo.com/27570335 “An Organic Chemist’s Perspective on Paleo” by Mathieu Lalonde, PhD was very informative on this subject! Very heavy on the sceince. I loved it. Thanks for this timely post!

  • diana

    Yes, Mat is a friend of mine and sent me the research for this post. Thanks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/tribe2012 John Dodge

    This article is extremely flawed in its approach. It deals with life style of managed people living in cities or farms – not indigenous humans living in their native habitat the tropics. Meat has only become popular to ward off malnutrition caused by high flour and grain intake of class based societies. Human food consists primarily of fruit and leaves with the addition of fish as you venture farther away from the tropics. Any other diets can be traced to the managed care of the empire builders.
    Most of this (commercial food) “science” comes from using the terrible colonial life style imposed on the native people of Europe by the Roman Empire as the base level of natural human diet and then showing how modern “civilized” management saved these people and increased their quality of life.
    No where do these “scientists” consider the thousands of years of healthy balanced life style of Indians in America, Europe and Asia and of course the most neglected people – the tropical villagers of Africa.

  • Anonymous

    The studies I reference in my article, “Why you should cook your food” are to illustrate specifically the difference in health consequences between cooked and raw food. If you are looking to see studies on native populations where they are not eating “European” food, please refer to the work of Staffan Lindeberg on the Kitava population. http://www.staffanlindeberg.com/TheKitavaStudy.html
    You might also be interested in the work of Dr. Weston A. Price in his book, “Nutrition and Physical Degeneration”.
    Some populations do survive little protein but I’ve not heard of a native population that was completely vegetarian. Even though some cultures seem to survive on sub-optimal food sources, I’m interested in what it optimal for human health. Based on the research I’ve seen, it appears that eating primarily cooked vegetables and protein seems to be optimal.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Valerie – Mat is actually a good friend and sent me the research articles.

  • Anonymous

    There is no enzyme activity in cooked food. Eating meat raises the risk for cancer in the body,osteo-arthritis,bone degeneration and heart issues.
    Read … The China Study by T Colin Campbell. 
    Excellent book.

  • Anonymous

    I’m very familiar with The China Study and I really enjoy this response to it: http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/08/03/the-china-study-a-formal-analysis-and-response/ by Denise Minger. There seems to be more than one flaw in the logic from the China Study.

  • Julianne Taylor

    I’ve noticed that many vegans have a thing about enzymes in food. And if we don’t get them we won’t be able to digest our food properly. There is also a theme that we have a bank full of enzymes and they run out eventually.
    Totally flawed scientifically, we make enzymes on an as needed basis as we digest food. We are constantly making them as we do all the other proteins in our body.

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting article. Thanks! I do eat raw meat several times a week and I incorporate raw foods in each meal, usually veggies, eggs, or dairy. I think it is a good idea to get both cooked and raw foods in the diet. Price found that most cultures used both raw and cooked foods. 

    Another option is to juice veggies, fruit, and organ meats. This is a great way to incorporate nutrient-dense raw food without the worries on digestion. I juice beef liver 1x/week and I juice veggies and fruits several times/week. The juice feels great to me!

    But I do love cooked meat as well and I always cook meat slow and low. 

    Also, I want to mention that we are all different and some people tolerate raw foods better than others. Observing the body is key!

  • luke murray

    There seems to be loads of misinformation here… Going on personal experience after eating a 100% raw diet for over 7 yrs including raw fatty meat everyday for 5 and now 2+ of mainly raw fatty meat and raw dairy, my health has only improved. Body cleanses itself naturally, with increased sustainable energy levels and most importantly, feeling grounded.
    Here is a thought… we don’t need roughage to keep our bowels moving,
    we need bacteria. Those lovely little helpers that the mainstream
    conditions us to fear. Fear not, as there are many, many people out
    there eating an all raw meat diet and thriving with the help of E-coli and friends!

  • diana

    I’m glad you feel good eating raw meat. I’m not sure what you mean about “loads of misinformation here” are you talking about my post? I have backed it up with scientific studies stating how cooked foods are optimal. Raw meat is ok, but the risks of contamination are high, the proteins are more difficult to break down and the fats are actually easier for our bodies to absorb in the cooked form based on what I read. You need to consume much more raw meat than cooked meat in order to obtain the same nutrients. I’m interested in the optimal diet for humans. Please take some time to read the studies I’ve referenced before calling it misinformation. N=1 is not proof that a raw diet is optimal. A lot of people on raw food diets feel good initially because they are eliminationg much of the foods that I also advocate removing (gluten, grains, processed foods, sugars, etc). However, after some time, their health declines, they lose muscle mass and end up getting sick. Many of my nutrition clients are ex-raw foodists. All this being said, I’m happy that you feel that it’s working for you.

  • Anonymous

    I’m glad you feel good eating raw meat. I’m not sure what you mean about “loads of misinformation here” are you talking about my post? I have backed it up with scientific studies stating how cooked foods are optimal. Raw meat is ok, but the risks of contamination are high, the proteins are more difficult to break down and the fats are actually easier for our bodies to absorb in the cooked form based on what I read. You need to consume much more raw meat than cooked meat in order to obtain the same nutrients. I’m interested in the optimal diet for humans. Please take some time to read the studies I’ve referenced before calling it misinformation. N=1 is not proof that a raw diet is optimal. A lot of people on raw food diets feel good initially because they are eliminationg much of the foods that I also advocate removing (gluten, grains, processed foods, sugars, etc). However, after some time, their health declines, they lose muscle mass and end up getting sick. Many of my nutrition clients are ex-raw foodists. All this being said, I’m happy that you feel that it’s working for you.